Home

Obscenity laws California

Free Delivery · Lowest Prices Online · Millions Of Books · Huge Rang

Huge Selection on Second Hand Books. Low Prices & Free Delivery. Start Shopping! World of Books is one of the largest online sellers of second-hand books in the worl (a) Obscene matter means matter, taken as a whole, that to the average person, applying contemporary statewide standards, appeals to the prurient interest, that, taken as a whole, depicts or describes sexual conduct in a patently offensive way, and that, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value

Practicing Law in Frontier California By Gordon Morris Bakke

  1. Obscenity law is the body of law that controls what images, speech, and other expressions people can legally communicate. Obscenity law pertains to suppressing or banning speech that is in violation of standards of good taste and decency
  2. e whether expressive materials cross the line into unprotected obscenity. The Miller test remains the guide in this area of First Amendment jurisprudence
  3. gly approved amendments to their state constitution that prohibited pay-TV and rejected the fair-housing law that forbade discri
  4. ors under the age of eighteen
  5. For most first-time offenders under California's indecent exposure law, a Penal Code 314 PC violation is a misdemeanor offense. 18. If convicted of simple misdemeanor indecent exposure, you may face. up to six (6) months in county jail, a maximum fine of one thousand dollars ($1,000), 19 and

California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court modifying its definition of obscenity from that of utterly without socially redeeming value to that which lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. It is now referred to as the three-prong standard or the Miller test United States obscenity law deals with the regulation or suppression of what is considered obscenity.In the United States, discussion of obscenity typically relates to pornography, as well as issues of freedom of speech and of the press, otherwise protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.Issues of obscenity arise at federal and state levels California established the so-called Miller test for obscenity

California, which established the Miller test for judges and jurors to determine if material can be classified as obscene. In the intervening years, advocates of a more lenient anti-pornography.. Federal law prohibits the possession with intent to sell or distribute obscenity, to send, ship, or receive obscenity, to import obscenity, and to transport obscenity across state boarders for purposes of distribution Obscenity is a confounding area of First Amendment law Obscenity remains one of the most controversial and confounding areas of First Amendment law, and Supreme Court justices have struggled mightily through the years to define it. Justice Potter Stewart could provide no definition for obscenity in Jacobellis v Syllabus by the Court Appellant was convicted of mailing unsolicited sexually explicit material in violation of a California statute that approximately incorporated the obscenity test formulated in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 418, 86 S.Ct. 975, 977, 16 L.Ed.2d 1 (plurality opinion) The term obscenity is a legal term, and in Miller v. California, supra the Supreme Court established a three-pronged test for determining whether a work (i.e., material or a performance) is..

California, the United States Supreme Court held that an obscenity law which imposes strict liability is unconstitutional Obscenity is a category of speech unprotected by the First Amendment. Obscenity laws are concerned with prohibiting lewd, filthy, or disgusting words or pictures. Indecent materials or depictions, normally speech or artistic expressions, may be restricted in terms of time, place, and manner, but are still protected by the First Amendment California Obscenity Charges and Penalties. If you or someone you know has been accused of possessing obscene matter in the State of California, contact Weber Law today for a consultation. CA Penal Code § 311, Definitions CA Penal Code § 311.2, Sending or bringing into state for sale or distribution; printing, exhibiting, distributing. United States Supreme Court. MILLER v. CALIFORNIA(1973) No. 70-73 Argued: November 7, 1972 Decided: June 21, 1973. Appellant was convicted of mailing unsolicited sexually explicit material in violation of a California statute that approximately incorporated the obscenity test formulated in Memoirs v

Obscenity Laws: How obscenity affects our children, our schools and our communities Obscenity is handled like slander and libel as speech that is NOT protected by the first amendment of our U.S. Constitution. However, the Obscenity Exemption Statute (OES) passed in the 1970's protects school and library employees who give damaging, pornographic materials to children [ Obscenity law aims to set legal boundaries for the use of images, writings, and speeches that individuals use to communicate with others. The U.S. legal system established obscenity laws to protect morality and prevent corruption of societal values OBSCENITY LAWS some cases amounts to a mandate. This is the First Amendment's provisions for freedom of speech California (1973) outlined three questions that must be asked and answered to determine if a particular material is obscene: 1. Whether the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest (an inordinate interest in sex); 2 CyBarrister.com finds obscenity to be a subset of pornography or sexually explicit speech.. Legally, obscenity is defined by the 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973), which holds that obscenity is a form of speech that: 1. Appeals to the prurient interest, as judged against local community standards; 2

Law section - Californi

  1. Adjudication over the constitutional law of obscenity began in Roth v. United States, 4 Footnote 354 U.S. 476 (1957). Heard at the same time and decided in the same opinion was Alberts v. California, involving, of course, a state obscenity law. The Court's first opinion in the obscenity field was Butler v
  2. Miller was arrested, charged, and convicted under a California law that banned selling, possessing, distributing, or publishing obscene materials. The law had been specifically crafted to comply with the Supreme Court's decision on obscenity and the First Amendment in Roth v. United States. A first conviction was defined as a misdemeanor
  3. The Miller test is the standard used by courts to define obscenity. It comes from the 1973 Supreme Court's 5-4 ruling in Miller v. California, in which Chief Justice Warren Burger, writing for the majority, held that obscene material is not protected by the First Amendment. This case is consistent with the Supreme Court's decision in Roth v. U.S
  4. * 14:106. Obscenity A. The crime of obscenity is the intentional: (1) Exposure of the genitals, pubic hair, anus, vulva, or female breast nipples in any public place or place open to the public view with the intent of arousing sexual desire or which appeals to prurient interest or is patently offensive

What is Obscenity Law? Palm Springs Attorney Californi

What is the law in California? Child pornography laws in California do not explicitly cover loli or manga depicting minors engaging in sexual activity. Court cases, however, have required there be a real person in the depiction.. California statutes prohibits the possession of child pornography. Child porn includes material that depicts a person under the age of 18 years personally engaging. California. That test limits obscenity to works that, taken as a whole, (1) appeal to the prurient Of course, it is possible for sexualized depictions of actual children to violate both obscenity and child pornography laws

However, under the obscenity laws in the United Kingdom, viewing pornographic images of minors, including anime, is illegal. What Does California Law Say About Lolicon? Under California Penal Code §311.3 , child pornography includes material that depicts children and minors simulating or engaging in sexual conduct California: Obscenity is anything the average person using modern community standards would think appeals to prurient interests, depict or describe sexual activity offensively, and be. When the Supreme Court codified obscenity law in Miller v. California (1972), it established that a work could not be classified as obscene unless it could be demonstrated that taken as a whole, (it) lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. But that ruling was hard-won; in the years leading up to Miller, countless authors and publishers were prosecuted for. United States The U.S. Supreme Court, in Roth v. United States and Alberts v. California, 354 U.S. 476, 77 S. Ct. 1304, 1 L. Ed. 2d 1498 (195 Obscenity, Obscenity laws embarrass alexis de tocqueville's claim that there is hardly a political question in the United States which does not sooner or later Romer V. Evans, Romer v. Evans Romer v In Smith v. California (1959), the Supreme Court ruled that an ordinance requiring a book store owner to be strictly liable for possessing or selling obscene material — meaning the owner had to know the contents of every book in the store — violated First Amendment rights. Eleazor Smith was a book store owner in Los Angeles in the 1950s

Miller v. California The First Amendment Encyclopedi

Miller v California sets out the modern test for obscenity. After years in which no Supreme Court opinion could command majority support, five members of the Court in Miller set out a several-part test for judging obscenity statutes: (1) the proscribed material must depict or describe sexual conduct in a patently offensive way, (2) the. Federal Obscenity Laws Federal obscenity laws, which are not being enforced, prohibit distribution of hardcore, obscene pornography on the Internet, on cable/satellite or hotel/motel TV and in sexually oriented businesses and other retail shops. The 93 U.S. Attorneys (each state has at least one) enforce the Federal obscenity laws. FBI Agents, Postal Inspectors and Customs.. Finally, in 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court adopted the three-part test that remains in place today. Use the cross-references and topics below to learn more about California statutes and laws on obscenity, which is a basic matter in California law. Earlier the Court had divided four-to-four and thus affirmed a state court judgment that Edmund Wilson's Memoirs of Hecate County was obscene. Pre. Extreme Associates (3), when a porn producer in California was charged with violating obscenity laws in Pennsylvania because officers were able to download it in that area. The court subsequently applied the community standards they were familiar with. This standard, if upheld, would lead to the law being applied with the community standards of. California. Here, even assuming that Alexander's texts were obscene under the Miller test, private and consensual text messages between two adults are not 'material' within the meaning of.

At the time California adopted its obscenity prosecution scheme in 1961, the Legislature did not enact a specific statute prohibiting the possession or distribution of child pornography. In 1969, the United States Supreme Court struck down a Georgia law banning the private possession of obscene material as violative of the First Amendment Between 1942 and 1956, Congress passed some 20 laws concerning obscenity, and almost every state did the same. Finally, in 1957, the Supreme Court announced the test for obscenity, holding that material is obscene if, in view of contemporary community standards, its dominant theme appeals to the average person's prurient interest California where the Supreme Court created a three-part test for obscenity. Miller defines obscenity as 1) whether the average person, applying contemporary community standards would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest, 2) whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual. Cable television programming, application of obscenity laws, see § 34-1247. Lewd, indecent or obscene acts, see § 22-1312. Emergency Legislation. For temporary amendment of section, see § 105(m) of the Omnibus Criminal Justice Reform Emergency Amendment Act of 1994 (D.C. Act 10-255, June 22, 1994, 41 DCR 4286)

Constitutional Law: The Meaning of Obscenity In California

California Child Pornography Laws - FindLa

OBSCENITY, crim. law. Such indecency as is calculated to promote the violation of the law, and the general corruption of morals. 2. The exhibition of an obscene picture is an indictable offence at common law, although not charged to have been exhibited in public, if it be averred that the picture, was exhibited to sundry persons for money. 2 S 2. The work depicts in a patently offensive way sexual conduct specifically defined by state law. 3. The work in question lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. (Miller v. California); remains the current definition of obscenity Obscenity Laws and Bestiality. March 7, 2015. OBSCENITY, PORNOGRAPHY, AND SAMUEL ROTH. Defining what is obscene or pornographic vs. merely erotic or sexy can be difficult. Erotic material tends to arouse sexual desire or excitement. Pornography and obscenity do that too, but take the imagery one step further. Sometimes a big step further But his controversial act and lifestyle caught the eyes of law enforcement across the country. He was arrested on drug abuse charges in Philadelphia and obscenity charges in San Francisco in late. Obscenity is 'hard-core' pornography that is so 'offensive' and so lacking in social value that it is denied First Amendment protection.-- Middleton & Chamberlin, The Law of Public Communication, p. 336. From 1879 until the early 1930s, American courts followed the Hicklin test, which was taken from an 1868 English case, Regina v. Hicklin

Penal Code 314 PC - Indecent Exposure - California La

  1. In terms of legal definitions, the terms pornography and obscenity need to be distinguished. Obscenity refers to pornographic content that has been judged by the legal system to be illegal. In the United States, most states use the 1973 Supreme Court decision in Miller vs. California as the legal definition of obscene. To be judged obscene.
  2. But these questions were barely addressed when the Court first seriously considered a constitutional challenge to obscenity laws in the 1957 cases of roth v. united states and Alberts v. California. The briefs presented the Court with profoundly different visions of first amendment law
  3. Without a serious disagreement among them, six jurors took only about two hours Saturday to eat lunch and then find three members of the rap group 2 Live Crew not guilty of violating obscenity.
  4. Though child pornography prosecutions are increasing, adult obscenity laws are unevenly enforced across the country, taking a back seat to high-profile areas like terrorism cases and drug enforcement
  5. Obscenity is highly subjective and is defined according to community standards. Lewdness is one of the crimes that falls under the category of obscenity. The words obscene, lewd and lascivious as used in the law, signify that form of immorality which has relation to sexual impurity and has a tendency to excite lustful thoughts
  6. Facts of the case. Roth operated a book-selling business in New York and was convicted of mailing obscene circulars and an obscene book in violation of a federal obscenity statute. Roth's case was combined with Alberts v. California, in which a California obscenity law was challenged by Alberts after his similar conviction for selling lewd and.
  7. Citizen's guide to US federal law on child pornography, US Dept. of Justice A concise summary of federal laws and cases regarding child pornography. Golden Globe Awards Order, FCC 2004 Even a single, fleeting, non-literal expletive use of the F-word in a broadcast is prohibited. Obscenity, indecency and profanity, Federal Communications Commissio

In such a case, the prosecution would have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the laws (including, in an obscenity case, the community standards) of the state where the predicate offense occurred had been violated. 209. 509 U.S. 544 (1993). 210. Id. at 550-551. 211. Id. at 554-555. 212. Austin v This is a topic that animated conservatives in the 1980s, at the height of the culture wars, but it has been largely dormant until, on December 6, four Republican congressmen sent a letter to U.S.

Miller v. California - Wikipedi

United States obscenity law - Wikipedi

  1. g. In 1962, Bruce was charged again with violating California's obscenity law at a performance at the Troubadour in West Hollywood. Less than two weeks later he faced charges in Chicago following a show at the Gate of Horn. Then he was arrested in Los Angeles for a performance at the.
  2. Browse Our Great Selection of Books & Get Free UK Delivery on Eligible Orders
  3. 2007 California Penal Code Chapter 7.5. Obscene Matter CA Codes (pen:311-312.7) PENAL CODE SECTION 311-312.7 311. As used in this chapter, the following definitions apply: (a) Obscene matter means matter, taken as a whole, that to the average person, applying contemporary statewide standards, appeals to the prurient interest, that, taken as a whole, depicts or describes sexual conduct in a.
  4. Miller v. California. Arguably the most important in a series of late-twentieth-century Supreme Court cases laying down the definition of Obscenity and setting down the boundaries as to how and when communities could regulate obscene materials. Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 93 S. Ct. 2607, 37 L. Ed. 2d 419 (1973) remained the Supreme Court.
  5. ation of the standards, which must be used to identify obscene material that a State.
  6. Law Office of Eugene Lee 633 W 5th St, Ste 2600 Los Angeles, CA 90071. Law Office of Eugene Lee 879 W 190th St Suite 400 Gardena, CA 90248. T:(213) 992-3299 F: (213) 596-0487. Disclaimer: This website is an advertisement. The information and material contained in this website are for general informational purposes only

Brief History of Obscenity in the United States Tim

Pornography & Obscenity Laws: Robert P

The law says elder or dependent adult abuse is: Physical abuse, neglect, financial abuse, abandonment, isolation, abduction (taking you out of the state against your will), or other behavior that causes physical harm, pain, or mental suffering; OR. Deprivation by a caregiver of things or services that the elder or dependent adult needs to avoid. We consider whether a California law imposing restric-tions on violent video games comports with the First Amendment. I California Assembly Bill 1179 (2005), Cal. Civ. Code Ann. §§1746-1746.5 (West 2009) (Act), prohibits the sale or rental of violent video games to minors, and requires their packaging to be labeled 18 The scare of obscenity in movies prompted over 100 cities in the United States to establish local censorship laws. The Motion Pictures Producers and Distributors Association was founded in 1992 to improve the image of the American film

CEOS Mission. The Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS) serves a unique and critical function in the enforcement of the nation's laws protecting children from sexual exploitation and prohibiting the distribution of obscenity. Our mission is to protect children from sexual exploitation through the vigorous enforcement of federal laws. California (413 U.S. 115), decided in tandem, it was held that the contemporary community standards of the area in question were the relevant standards, and the prosecution need not establish a national standard against which to evaluate material for obscenity California, the 1973 Supreme Court ruling that, on the 100th anniversary of the Comstock Act, redefined obscenity with a three-part test that invoked state law, artistic merit and contemporary. The Defendant, Mr. Roth (Defendant #1) was convicted of mailing obscene advertising and an obscene book in violation of a federal statute barring the mailing of obscenity.. The Defendant, Mr. Alberts (Defendant #2) was convicted under a California law for lewdly keeping for sale obscene and indecent books and publishing an. Obscenity, on the other hand, is legally defined; however the legal definition is purposefully vague. Its current definition is based on what is commonly referred to as the Miller Test, which stems from the 1973 Supreme Court case Miller v. California (discussed later in this paper)

Citizen's Guide To U

Sec. 43.23. OBSCENITY. (a) A person commits an offense if, knowing its content and character, he wholesale promotes or possesses with intent to wholesale promote any obscene material or obscene device. (b) Except as provided by Subsection (h), an offense under Subsection (a) is a state jail felony The California Attorney General launched a groundbreaking initiative to combat cyber exploitation. Posting intimate images online without consent undermines privacy, basic civil rights, and public safety. The California Department of Justice is committed to holding perpetrators of these crimes accountable. The Attorney General convened the first-of-its-kind partnership of 50 major technology. How Laws Die. In the Unites States, using a computer to download obscenity is a crime, punishable by up to five years in prison. Federal law makes it a crime to use a computer service to. A 16-year-old California boy dumped by his high school girlfriend didn't violate a state obscenity law by using four-letter words in anguished text messages to his ex, an appellate court ruled. Ms. Buchanan, the 44-year-old daughter of a steelworker who went through law school as a single mother, is disdainful of prosecutors who have avoided taking on obscenity cases

Primary Citation: Animal Legal & Historical Center. Summary: This table details state laws prohibiting sexual conduct between humans and animals. The majority of states (about 46) have some provision that criminalizes engaging in sexual conduct with animals. Currently, Hawaii, New Mexico, West Virginia and Wyoming lack such a law Obscene & Obscenity. In law, Obscene and Obscenity are seen promoting a violation of the law and the general corruption of morals. The exhibition of an obscene picture is an indictable offense at common law, although not chargeable if it has been exhibited in public and it was asserted that the picture was exhibited for purchase There IS actually still an Obscenity Law in effect today, but it is difficult to define for many people. The U.S. Supreme Court defines it as: material which deals with sex in a manner appealing to prurient interest, utterly without redeeming social importance. Obscenity is NOT protected by our First Amendment right, and obscenity is done on a state-by-state basis

Obscenity and Pornography The First Amendment Encyclopedi

  1. In a 5-to-4 decision, the Court held that obscene materials did not enjoy First Amendment protection. The Court modified the test for obscenity established in Roth v.United States and Memoirs v.Massachusetts, holding that [t]he basic guidelines for the trier of fact must be: (a) whether 'the average person, applying contemporary community standards' would find that the work, taken as a whole.
  2. California (1973), in which the U.S. Supreme Court attempted to provide a framework for defining obscenity by arguing that it should be based on contemporary community standards. In doing so, the court avoided describing specifically what those standards should be and left it to the discretion of individual communities
  3. e whether material is obscene in terms of appealing to a prurient interest and being patently offensive and lacking in value
  4. ing what constituted obscene material
  5. istry - on Monday delivered a petition to Attor
  6. A formal response to the senators' letter, sent on Friday, asserted that the department has charged violations of the federal obscenity laws over 150 times since October 2008, and has.
  7. al responsibility may not be imposed without some element of scienter on the part of the defendant. Smith v. California, 361 U. S. 147 (1959); Hamling v. United States, 418 U. S. 87 (1974). D Section 263.15's prohibition incorporates a definition of sexual conduct that comports with the above-stated principles

Public Indecency. Public indecency generally refers to acts involving nudity or sexual activity in view of the public, often with the intent to shock, offend, or arouse. It includes criminal offenses like indecent exposure and lewd conduct. Some states use the term public indecency to refer to other offenses relating to public. In 1962, Bruce was charged again with violating California's obscenity law at a performance at the Troubadour in West Hollywood. Less than two weeks later he faced charges in Chicago following a show at the Gate of Horn. Then he was arrested in Los Angeles for a performance at the Unicorn. While the Troubadour and Unicorn trial ended in a. In 1873, obscenity laws were adopted on the federal level due in part to the efforts of Anthony Comstock. Comstock was a United States Postal Inspector and politician responsible for the passing of the Comstock Act, which made it a criminal offense to distribute obscene materials through the mail

Compared with sexually explicit media, live sex shows have very little protection under the law, though the Supreme Court in Oregon did overturn two state laws concerning sex shows on free speech and expression grounds in 2005. The turning point in the porn-or-prostitution debate occurred in the 1980's in California Under the Bush administration, obscenity laws went through a period of revival and assumed a more prominent position in federal law enforcement efforts. This largely began in 2005 when the FBI. The court said that the Supreme Court's decision upholding the Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA) makes it clear that libraries can adopt Internet use agreements prohibiting users from accessing visual depictions of child pornography and obscenity. That does not mean, however, that libraries can dispense with due process The 2008 Federal Obscenity Conviction of Paul Little and What It Reveals About Obscenity Law and Prosecutions Robert D. Richards* and Clay Calvert** ABSTRACT This Article provides an inside perspective on the 2008 obscenity trial and conviction of veteran adult movie producer Paul Little, who is known in the adult industry as Max Hardcore 945, 964-65 (2004) (noting that obscenity laws will be void under Lawrence if the decision stands for the idea that moral disapproval is insufficient justification to infringe upon an individual's liberty); James W. Paulsen, The Significance of Lawrence, Hous. LAW., Feb. 2004

the area of obscenity, the Law must establish certain minimums of conduct and maximums of control. Herein lies the problem, for the. 1. Statement by Judge Curtis Bok, for the American Library Association - American Book Publishers Counsel, Westchester Conference on the Freedom to Read, quoted in Larrabee, The Cuiltura Context of Sex Cemnorship. N.J. city shuts down burlesque show, citing obscenity laws Updated Jan 30, 2019; Posted Mar 29, 2018 Jersey City shut down a burlesque show starring Lillian Bustle at FM on Newark Avenue The Horror of Canadian Obscenity Law. impermissible is central to the case involving California's ban on sales of may declare a law or part of a law to apply temporarily notwithstanding. pass laws against indecent behavior. Cincinnati and Dayton, Ohio (1849) and Chicago, Illinois (1851) were among the first to prohibit obscene publications and immoral plays. Early state laws against obscenity, which previously had been a common law offense, were passed by Illinois (1845), California (1858), and Pennsylvania (1860)

Marvin MILLER, Appellant, v

[Rev. 12/21/2019 10:56:56 AM--2019] CHAPTER 201 - CRIMES AGAINST PUBLIC DECENCY AND GOOD MORALS. NONSUPPORT OF SPOUSE, FORMER SPOUSE OR CHILD. NRS 201.015 Minor child defined.. NRS 201.020 Penalties; jurisdiction.. NRS 201.030 Institution of proceedings: Verified complaint.. NRS 201.051 Affirmative defense: Notice of intent to claim; notice of rebuttal witnesses; notice of provisions of. A 1986 report from the California attorney general on organized crime indicates that the obscenity trade industry takes in between $7 billion and $10 billion annually. The Federal Obscenity Task Force and the Obscenity Law Center are the centerpiece of a major Federal initiative to bring about more effective obscenity and child pornography. California law prohibits most private employers from asking about arrests that did not result in a conviction. However, if you apply for a job in law enforcement, in another state, or with the federal government, you may be asked about arrests as well as convictions. If there is a warrant out for your arrest, you may be held in custody

Summary Of Obscenity And Related Law

The Ohio anti-obscenity statute was unconstitutional, based on both the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, because (1) the statute was vaguely written and did not define standards for what defined obscene, and (2) the anti-obscenity laws of other states were directed at sellers, publishers, and exhibitors of obscene. The Supreme Court ruled Monday the states may not ban the sale or rental of violent videogames to minors. The case the justices decided concerned a 2005 California ban adopted by state lawmakers The California law provides that a video game cannot qualify as 'violent' unless 'the range of options available to a player includes killing, maiming, dismembering, or sexually assaulting an. Webb, 43, was arrested in November by two undercover police officers for selling sexual toys and charged with violating Texas obscenity laws. She could face up to a year in jail and a fine of.

First AmendmentQuestion Did the California Penal Codes obscenityCivil Liberties: First Amendment FreedomsDemocrats' Racism & Sexism on Display | National ReviewUNDERMINING LAWS | StopTheKinseyInstituteGCD :: Issue :: Verotika #4